<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sponsored Conversations: And the debate continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.britopian.com/2009/04/20/sponsored-conversations-and-the-debate-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.britopian.com/2009/04/20/sponsored-conversations-and-the-debate-continues/</link>
	<description>Social Media Blog written by Michael Brito.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuval</title>
		<link>http://www.britopian.com/2009/04/20/sponsored-conversations-and-the-debate-continues/#comment-49827</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britopian.com/?p=252#comment-49827</guid>
		<description>I agree, I find the concept of Sponsored Conversation as a natural evolutionary stage in the social net. It is here and it is here to stay.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The issue as raised by Michael is disclosure, or the separation of content that is independent and content that is sponsored.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If search engines have found a clear (and almost standard) way of letting us identify between the natural search and the paid search, the same should manifest in social content publications.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, the difference between search and published content is that search is almost completely automated while the content that is published required a human being. Search can run two separate algorithms simultaneously without (hopefully) one influencing the other. Can a human be expected to do the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I find the concept of Sponsored Conversation as a natural evolutionary stage in the social net. It is here and it is here to stay.</p>
<p>The issue as raised by Michael is disclosure, or the separation of content that is independent and content that is sponsored.</p>
<p>If search engines have found a clear (and almost standard) way of letting us identify between the natural search and the paid search, the same should manifest in social content publications.</p>
<p>However, the difference between search and published content is that search is almost completely automated while the content that is published required a human being. Search can run two separate algorithms simultaneously without (hopefully) one influencing the other. Can a human be expected to do the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefanie Hartman</title>
		<link>http://www.britopian.com/2009/04/20/sponsored-conversations-and-the-debate-continues/#comment-47423</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefanie Hartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britopian.com/?p=252#comment-47423</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on being named to the advisory board. I&#039;ll be keeping an eye out to see if sponsored conversations can duplicate paid search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on being named to the advisory board. I&#8217;ll be keeping an eye out to see if sponsored conversations can duplicate paid search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred H Schlegel</title>
		<link>http://www.britopian.com/2009/04/20/sponsored-conversations-and-the-debate-continues/#comment-47387</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred H Schlegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britopian.com/?p=252#comment-47387</guid>
		<description>Since sooner or later folks have to eat, disclosure is the only option.  Truth is, while we had a short period of time when one could argue advertisers needed reporters more than reporters needed advertisers, there has always been a need for better disclosure - whether you own stocks, take advertising, pay-for-post or heck, eat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since sooner or later folks have to eat, disclosure is the only option.  Truth is, while we had a short period of time when one could argue advertisers needed reporters more than reporters needed advertisers, there has always been a need for better disclosure &#8211; whether you own stocks, take advertising, pay-for-post or heck, eat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Hartjen</title>
		<link>http://www.britopian.com/2009/04/20/sponsored-conversations-and-the-debate-continues/#comment-47380</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Hartjen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britopian.com/?p=252#comment-47380</guid>
		<description>Good post, and right on the money, Michael.  You ask, &quot;It&#039;s in the DNA of our humanity to be real with people, no?&quot;  It might be in the DNA of (most) people.  But, often, it&#039;s not in the DNA of people on the web :).  Keep spreading the good word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, and right on the money, Michael.  You ask, &#8220;It&#8217;s in the DNA of our humanity to be real with people, no?&#8221;  It might be in the DNA of (most) people.  But, often, it&#8217;s not in the DNA of people on the web <img src='http://www.britopian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  Keep spreading the good word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.britopian.com/2009/04/20/sponsored-conversations-and-the-debate-continues/#comment-47379</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.britopian.com/?p=252#comment-47379</guid>
		<description>i have been following this for quite some time. Payperpost was indeed a problem for brands, but Izea did a great job transforming it into a product that promotes disclosure and authenticity -- great job Murphy. He listened to the community feedback, iterated the product and yet some people are still mad.


I really don&#039;t think it&#039;s about &quot;sponsored conversations&quot; anymore. I think it maybe personal but that&#039;s just my opinion. 





</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been following this for quite some time. Payperpost was indeed a problem for brands, but Izea did a great job transforming it into a product that promotes disclosure and authenticity &#8212; great job Murphy. He listened to the community feedback, iterated the product and yet some people are still mad.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s about &#8220;sponsored conversations&#8221; anymore. I think it maybe personal but that&#8217;s just my opinion. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

